Your body has a strange property: you can learn information about the *entire* organism from a single cell. Pick a cell, dive into the nucleus, and extract the DNA. You can now regrow the entire creature from that tiny sample.

There's a math analogy here. Take a function, pick a specific point, and dive in. You can pull out enough data from a single point to rebuild the entire function. Whoa. It's like remaking a movie from a single frame.

The Taylor Series discovers the "math DNA" behind a function and lets us rebuild it from a single data point. Let's see how it works.

## Pulling information from a point

Given a function like $f(x) = x^2$, what can we discover at a single location?

Normally we'd expect to calculate a single value, like $f(4) = 16$. But there's much more beneath the surface:

- $f(x)$ = Value of function at point $x$
- $f'(x)$ = First derivative, or how fast the function is changing (the velocity)
- $f''(x)$ = Second derivative, or how fast the
*changes*are changing (the acceleration) - $f'''(x)$ = Third derivative, or how fast the
*changes*in the changes are changing (acceleration of the acceleration) - And so on

Investigating a single point reveals multiple, possibly infinite, bits of information about the behavior. (Some functions have an endless amount of data (derivatives) at a single point).

So, given all this information, what should we do? Regrow the organism from a single cell, of course! (*Maniacal cackle here.*)

## Growing a Function from a point

Our plan is to grow a function from a single starting point. But how can we describe any function in a generic way?

The big aha moment: imagine any function, at its core, is a polynomial (with possibly infinite terms):

To rebuild our function, we start at a fixed point ($c_0$) and add in a bunch of other terms based on the value we feed it (like $c_1x$). The "DNA" is the values $c_0, c_1, c_2, c_3$ that describe our function exactly.

Ok, we have a generic "function format". But how do we find the coefficients for a specific function like sin(x) (height of angle x on the unit circle)? How do we pull out its DNA?

Time for the magic of 0.

Let's start by plugging in the function value at $x=0$. Doing this, we get:

Every term vanishes except $c_0$, which makes sense: the starting point of our blueprint should be $f(0)$. For $f(x) = \sin(x)$, we can work out $c_0 = \sin(0) = 0$. We have our first bit of DNA!

## Getting More DNA

Now that we know $c_0$, how do we isolate $c_1$ in this equation?

Hrm. A few ideas:

Can we set $x = 1$? That gives $f(1) = c_0 + c_1(1) + c_2(1^2) + c_3(1^3) + \cdots$ . Although we know $c_0$, the other constants are summed together. We can't pull out $c_1$ by itself.

What if we divide by $x$? This gives:

Then we can set $x=0$ to make the other terms disappear... right? It's a nice idea, except we're now dividing by zero.

Hrm. This approach is really close. How can we *almost* divide by zero? Using the derivative!

If we take the derivative of the blueprint of $f(x)$, we get:

Every power gets reduced by 1 and the $c_0$, a constant value, becomes zero. It's almost too convenient.

Now we can isolate $c_1$ using our $x=0$ trick:

In our example, $\sin'(x) = \cos(x)$ so in our example: $f'(0) = \sin'(0) = \cos(0) = 1 = c_1$

Yay, one more bit of DNA! This is the magic of the Taylor series: by repeatedly applying the derivative and setting $x = 0$, we can pull out the polynomial DNA.

Let's try another round:

After taking the second derivative, the powers are reduced again. The first two terms ($c_0$ and $c_1x$) disappear, and we can again isolate $c_2$ by setting $x=0$:

For our sine example, $\sin'' = -\sin$, so:

or $c_2 = 0$.

As we keep taking derivatives, we're performing more multiplications and growing a factorial in front of each term (1!, 2!, 3!).

**The Taylor Series for a function around point x=0 is:**

(Technically, the Taylor series around the point $x=0$ is called the MacLaurin series.)

**The generalized Taylor series, extracted from any point a is:**

The idea is the same. Instead of our regular blueprint, we use:

Since we're growing from $f(a)$, we can see that $f(a) = c_0 + 0 + 0 + \dots = c_0$. The other coefficients can be extracted by taking derivatives and setting $x = a$ (instead of $x =0$).

## Example: Taylor Series of sin(x)

Plugging in derivatives into the formula above, here's the Taylor series of $\sin(x)$ around $x = 0$:

And here's what that looks like:

A few notes:

**1) Sine has infinite terms**

Sine is an infinite wave, and as you can guess, needs an infinite number of terms to keep it going. Simpler functions (like $f(x) = x^2 + 3$) are already in their "polynomial format" and don't have infinite derivatives to keep the DNA going.

**2) Sine is missing every other term**

If we repeatedly take the derivative of sine at x = 0 we get:

with values:

Ignoring the division by the factorial, we get the pattern:

So the DNA of sine is something like [0, 1, 0, -1] repeating.

**3) Different starting positions have different DNA**

For fun, here's the Taylor series of $\sin(x)$ starting at $x =\pi$ (link):

A few notes:

The DNA is now something like [0, -1, 0, 1]. The cycle is similar, but the starting value has changed since we're starting at $x=\pi$.

Written as calculated numbers, the denominators 1, 6, 120, 5040 look strange. But they're just every other factorial: 1! = 1, 3! = 6, 5! =120, 7! = 5040. In general, the Taylor series can have gnarly denominators.

- The $O(x^{12})$ term means there are other components of order (power) $x^{12}$ and higher. Because $\sin(x)$ has infinite derivatives, we have infinite terms and the computer has to cut us off somewhere. (
*You've had enough Tayloring for today, buddy.*)

## Application: Function Approximations

A popular use of Taylor series is getting a quick approximation for a function. If you want a tadpole, do you need the DNA for the entire frog?

The Taylor series has a bunch of terms, typically ordered by importance:

- $c_0 = f(0)$, the constant term, is the exact value at the point
- $c_1 = f'(0)x$, the linear term, tells us what speed to move from our point
- $c_2= \frac{f''(0)}{2!}x^2 $, the quadratic term, tells us how much to accelerate away from our point
- and so on

If we only need a prediction for a few instants around our point, the initial position & velocity may be good enough:

If we're tracking for longer, then acceleration becomes important:

As we get further from our starting point, we need more terms to keep our prediction accurate. For example, the linear model $\sin(x) = x$ is a good prediction around $x=0$. As we get further out, we need to account for more terms.

Similarly, $e^x \sim 1 + x$ works well for small interest rates: 1% discrete interest is 1.01 after one time period, 1% continuous interest is a tad higher than 1.01. As time goes on, the linear model falls behind because it ignores the compounding effects.

## Application: Comparing Functions

What's a common application of DNA? Paternity tests.

If we have a few functions, we can compare their Taylor series to see if they're related.

Here's the expansions of $\sin(x)$, $\cos(x)$, and $e^x$:

There's a family resemblence in the sequences, right? Clean powers of $x$ divided by a factorial?

One problem is the sequence for $e^x$ has positive terms, while sine and cosine alternate signs. How can we link these together?

Euler's great insight was realizing an imaginary number could swap the sign from positive to negative:

Whoa. Using an imaginary exponent and separating into odd/even powers reveals that sine and cosine are hiding inside the exponential function. Amazing.

Although this proof of Euler's Formula doesn't show *why* the imaginary number makes sense, it reveals the baby daddy hiding backstage.

## Appendix: Assorted Aha! Moments

**Relationship to Fourier Series**

The Taylor Series extracts the "polynomial DNA" and the Fourier Series/Transform extracts the "circular DNA" of a function. Both see functions as built from smaller parts (polynomials or exponential paths).

**Does the Taylor Series always work?**

This gets into mathematical analysis beyond my depth, but certain functions aren't easily (or ever) approximated with polynomials.

Notice that powers like $x^2, x^3$ explode as $x$ grows. In order to have a slow, gradual curve, you need an army of polynomial terms fighting it out, with one winner barely emerging. If you stop the train too early, the approximation explodes again.

For example, here's the Taylor Series for $\ln(1 + x)$. The black line is the curve we want, and adding more terms, even dozens, barely gets us accuracy beyond $x=1.0$. It's just too hard to maintain a gentle slope with terms that want to run hog wild.

In this case, we only have a radius of convergence where the approximation stays accurate (such as around $|x| < 1$).

**Turning geometric to algebraic definitions**

Sine is often defined geometrically: the height of a line on a circular figure.

Turning this into an equation seems really hard. The Taylor Series gives us a process: If we know a single value and how it changes (the derivative), we can reverse-engineer the DNA.

Similarly, the description of $e^x$ as "the function with its derivative equal to the current value" yields the DNA [1, 1, 1, 1], and polynomial $f(x) = 1 + \frac{1}{1!}x + \frac{1}{2!}x^2 + \frac{1}{3!}x^3 + \dots $. We went from a verbal description to an equation.

Phew! A few items to ponder.

Happy math.

### Join Over 450k Monthly Readers

Enjoy the article? There's plenty more to help you build a lasting, intuitive understanding of math. Join the newsletter for bonus content and the latest updates.

## Other Posts In This Series

- A Gentle Introduction To Learning Calculus
- Understanding Calculus With A Bank Account Metaphor
- Prehistoric Calculus: Discovering Pi
- A Calculus Analogy: Integrals as Multiplication
- Calculus: Building Intuition for the Derivative
- How To Understand Derivatives: The Product, Power & Chain Rules
- How To Understand Derivatives: The Quotient Rule, Exponents, and Logarithms
- An Intuitive Introduction To Limits
- Intuition for Taylor Series (DNA Analogy)
- Why Do We Need Limits and Infinitesimals?
- Learning Calculus: Overcoming Our Artificial Need for Precision
- A Friendly Chat About Whether 0.999... = 1
- Analogy: The Calculus Camera
- Abstraction Practice: Calculus Graphs
- Quick Insight: Easier Arithmetic With Calculus
- How to Add 1 through 100 using Calculus
- Integral of Sin(x): Geometric Intuition