**Summary: The Golden Ratio is special because it perfectly balances addition and multiplication.**

The Golden Ratio (1.618...) is often presented with an air of mysticism as "the perfect proportion". Setting aside whether we can find the Golden Ratio in the leaves of a nearby houseplant, what makes it special from a math perspective?

Well, let's try to make a pattern that's as balanced (symmetric) as possible.

A quick guess is something like `1, 1, 1, 1, 1`

. Every item is identical, but it's not very interesting -- it's a song where every word is the same. Does it rhyme? Yeah. Do I care? Not really.

Ok, let's try `1, 2, 3, 4, 5`

. There's a symmetry in the relationship that every element is one more than the previous. But if we skip around beyond neighboring elements, there's no real connection: what do 3, 8, and 17 have in common?

Ok, fine. What about `1, 2, 4, 8, 16`

? Each element is twice the previous, and all the numbers are clean powers of two. But... what about addition? Can we build new elements from the previous ones?

- 1 + 2 = 3 [not quite 4...]
- 1 + 2 + 4 = 7 [not quite 8...]
- 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 = 15 [not quite 16...]

Argh. We can concoct a rule for addition ("Every element is the sum of all previous elements... plus an extra 1"), but that's not clean and you know it. Let's figure this out.

## Symmetry Between Addition and Multiplication

Our goal is a pattern that's connected with both addition and multiplication. No varying number of additions, no cute "+1" on the end. Just a clean, simple relationship.

First off, we need to make every item connected by multiplication. We need powers:

`1 x x^2 x^3 x^4`

Whatever number the pattern uses (`x`

), everything will be a power of it (just like 1, 2, 4, 8, although that sequence wasn't symmetric enough).

Next, we need an "addition symmetry" that connects the items. Every element should be buildable from the previous ones without extra rules. Throwing a few ideas against the wall:

- Can we have
`1 + x = x`

? If we subtract x from both sides, that leads to 1 = 0. Uh oh, we're breaking math. - How about
`1 + 1 = x`

? Maybe we can allow multiple copies of everything. But that's just another way of getting x=2, you sneak. - How about
`1 + x = 1`

? Ack, that just implies x = 0.`0, 0, 0, 0`

is symmetric but not interesting.

Hrm. The next addition pattern that might make sense is `1 + x = x^2`

. If we follow this idea, here's what happens:

A few notes:

- Starting from a single connection
`1 + x = x^2`

, we can multiply through by`x`

and get`x + x^2 = x^3`

. Every element is made from the previous two. - x
^{0}is another way to write 1. Makes the pattern easier to see, I think. - Everything in the pattern grid is just our original pattern, shifted a bit. Neat.

Ok. That's the goal for the pattern, let's try to solve it.

We can find the "x" that makes this relationship true using the quadratic formula:

Plugging in a=1, b=-1, and c=-1, we get:

We only want a positive solution (the new part can't be negative), so we have

We label the solution Phi (phi).

You can see it happening below. There are slight differences as the decimals go on -- computers have fixed precision.

## Visualize the Intuition

Many descriptions of the Golden Ratio describe splitting a whole into parts, each of which is in the golden ratio:

I prefer the "growth factor" scenario, where we start with a single item (1.0) and evolve it, while keeping it linked to its ancestors with both arithmetic and multiplication. Just describing a ratio doesn't call out the symmetry we're able to achieve.

Visually, I see a growing blob, like this:

As we scale by Phi each time (1.618) we get:

- Addition symmetry: Each element is the sum of the previous two
- Multiplication symmetry: Each element is a scaled version of the previous
- Growth symmetry: Addition and multiplication change the pattern identically

Aha! That's a nice combo if I ever saw one. The "growing blob" can represent the length of a line, a 2d shape, an angle -- which can lead to interesting patterns:

The key relationship is we move from one blob to the next, such that multiplication and addition have the same effect:

We've described the Golden Ratio with different phrasing: the scaling factor (f) must equal the original (1) plus the previous item (1/f). We divide by our growth factor to find the previous element given the current one.

Solving f = 1 + frac(1)(f) yields the Golden Ratio as before.

## Is the Golden Ratio Everywhere?

The Golden Ratio tends to be oversold in its occurrences. While it may appear occasionally in nature, buildings, and portraits, if you draw lines thick enough many things have a ratio of about 1.5 to 1.

I think the deeper intuition comes from realizing we've made addition and multiplication symmetric.

The Fibonacci sequence is built from having every piece built from the two before:

Using a certain formula, we can jump to a Fibonacci number by repeated scaling (exponents) instead of laboriously adding the parts. And maybe we'd come to *expect* the Golden Ratio here, since it's the scaling factor that allows two parts to add to the next item in the sequence. (The specifics of dividing by √5 are because we need to adjust based on the starting pieces.)

Rather than hunting for examples of the Golden Ratio in the produce aisle, let's soak in the beauty of balancing the forces of multiplication and addition.

Happy math.

## Leave a Reply

26 Comments on "Intuition For The Golden Ratio"

Thanks! I didn’t think about in this aspect, addition and multiplication symmetry. Very nice!

Thanks Hitoshi!

Very nice…i didnt think symmetry in this way….

I consider it Fibonacci’s geometric sequence, ;)

I am studying economics and can’t thank Kalid more for bringing much needed clarity of thought in Math. Your work is something that I am grateful to. Thanks for your efforts.

Excellent,,as always .. golden ratio demystified. .Thanks a ton

Glad you enjoyed it!

Well done Kalid. Your intuition has teased out a deeper underlying principle in the form of a symmetry consideration. Maybe that’s the underlying objective mathematical truth and the aesthetic appeal of sunflowers, pine cones, picture/building proportions, etc. are the subjective aspect

Thanks Richard — yep, I think our brains subjectively enjoy/notice the symmetry before the math comes into play. When we see the math truth as well it’s doubly beautiful :).

Great. I am every bit of an idiot regarding trad. Formlae, but with your intuitive approach I can say now I’m just starting to understand,and enjoy,maths.

Thank you again

Thanks Andrew — there’s always a deeper insights the formulas are pointing too. Too often we get caught in the symbols and not what they mean.

Wonderful!

Great Explanation. What are you thoughts on Lucas Series with respect to your explanation.

This is just beautiful

Thanks Susie, glad you liked it.

I have always been intrigued by the Golden Ratio and its use in art and architecture as well as its appearance in nature. Thanks so much for this great article.

Have you written anything about the quadratic equation that would perhaps deepen my appreciation for it?

Thanks Nancy. Great question — I see the quadratic equation as a systematic way to rearrange a pile of “stuff” (ax^2 + bx + c) into a neat rectangle. If you imagine the original equation as a bunch of different-sized sheets of paper, the quadratic equation is a systematic process to trim edges and re-arrange the strips until you have a single rectangular sheet. It’s the same amount of material, but neatly put together. I’d like to do an article on this.

I’d love to read an article you’ve written on this.

Brilliant im bad at math but love your articles.

Thanks Tomer!

Khalid sir,,one query.As you have taught in ur previous articles that irrational numbers are result of an infinite process as e (co phi

Khalid sir,,one query.As you have taught in ur previous articles that irrational numbers are result of an infinite process as e (continuous compounding ), phi(adding sides to a polygon resulting in a circle),why result of golden ratio is irrational number..

Great explanation again, thanks

Thanks for good article

Could you make an article on the intuition for sequences and series?

In fact i didn’t realize this and i learn something out of it. very nice