<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Surprising Uses of the Pythagorean Theorem	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 08:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: gita nair		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gita nair]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 08:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-surprising-look-at-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Wonderful  . Thanks for  different view of teaching mathematical topics&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful  . Thanks for  different view of teaching mathematical topics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Danilo Souza Morães		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danilo Souza Morães]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 12:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-surprising-look-at-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568070&quot;&gt;kalid&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;That makes a lot of sense. Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568070">kalid</a>.</p>
<p>That makes a lot of sense. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-surprising-look-at-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568064&quot;&gt;Danilo Souza Morães&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Great question. I see squaring terms as turning line segments (which can be oriented in a direction) into area (which typically doesn&#039;t have a directional orientation). So you are converting something where direction matters into something where it doesn&#039;t. In a way, squaring a line moves us into measuring the &quot;self-similarity&quot;. For two distinct objects, we can&#039;t compare them directly, but we can compare how similar they are to themselves. You might like this: &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/pythagorean-sweep/&quot; title=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/pythagorean-sweep/&quot; rel=&quot;ugc&quot;&gt;https://betterexplained.com...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568064">Danilo Souza Morães</a>.</p>
<p>Great question. I see squaring terms as turning line segments (which can be oriented in a direction) into area (which typically doesn't have a directional orientation). So you are converting something where direction matters into something where it doesn't. In a way, squaring a line moves us into measuring the "self-similarity". For two distinct objects, we can't compare them directly, but we can compare how similar they are to themselves. You might like this: <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/pythagorean-sweep/" title="https://betterexplained.com/articles/pythagorean-sweep/" rel="ugc">https://betterexplained.com...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Danilo Souza Morães		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/surprising-uses-of-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danilo Souza Morães]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2021 00:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-surprising-look-at-the-pythagorean-theorem/#comment-568064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I think it&#039;s intuitive that we can compare the side of similar triangles squared, but do you have an intuition as to why we have to square and couldn&#039;t find a relationship/proportion with only the sides? This intuition shows that squaring works and is pretty intuitive, but doesn&#039;t explain how we got at squaring in the first place. Makes me wonder what other relationships I&#039;m missing because I haven&#039;t tried cubing numbers for example. Any thoughts?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it's intuitive that we can compare the side of similar triangles squared, but do you have an intuition as to why we have to square and couldn't find a relationship/proportion with only the sides? This intuition shows that squaring works and is pretty intuitive, but doesn't explain how we got at squaring in the first place. Makes me wonder what other relationships I'm missing because I haven't tried cubing numbers for example. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
