<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Share your insights: aha.betterexplained.com (beta)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/share-your-insights-aha-betterexplained-com-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/share-your-insights-aha-betterexplained-com-beta/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erwin		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/share-your-insights-aha-betterexplained-com-beta/#comment-444644</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 15:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=1250#comment-444644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Great ? I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, website theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Nice task.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great ? I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your website. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related information ended up being truly simple to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it in the least. Reasonably unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or something, website theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Nice task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 1417279		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/share-your-insights-aha-betterexplained-com-beta/#comment-392399</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[1417279]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=1250#comment-392399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;WCRTEXTAREATESTINPUT8918777&#039;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WCRTEXTAREATESTINPUT8918777'</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/share-your-insights-aha-betterexplained-com-beta/#comment-271157</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=1250#comment-271157</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks David! I have many old, half-finished notes from previous classes, and scattered text files, etc. I try to think about a topic I&#039;m interested in, jotting down notes about what&#039;s confusing, then search for analogies which help clarify [some work, some don&#039;t... the ones what work, I try to refine until they can explain more and more of the concept]. I find textbooks, Wikipedia, etc. decent for checking a result found via intuition (is this analogy actually working?), but usually they aren&#039;t good for getting insights directly, as they&#039;re often written in a very dry / rigorous style :).&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks David! I have many old, half-finished notes from previous classes, and scattered text files, etc. I try to think about a topic I'm interested in, jotting down notes about what's confusing, then search for analogies which help clarify [some work, some don't... the ones what work, I try to refine until they can explain more and more of the concept]. I find textbooks, Wikipedia, etc. decent for checking a result found via intuition (is this analogy actually working?), but usually they aren't good for getting insights directly, as they're often written in a very dry / rigorous style :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Hadaller		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/share-your-insights-aha-betterexplained-com-beta/#comment-271031</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Hadaller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=1250#comment-271031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Also, Kalid, where is it that you get this fantastic intuition from? I&#039;ve been reading some of your other articles and the concepts are so well put! Are there any textbooks that you&#039;re drawing your knowledge from in particular, or are you using your undergrad notes. Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, Kalid, where is it that you get this fantastic intuition from? I've been reading some of your other articles and the concepts are so well put! Are there any textbooks that you're drawing your knowledge from in particular, or are you using your undergrad notes. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
