<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intuition for the Quadratic Formula	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:08:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Hespenheide		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/#comment-567821</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Hespenheide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 06:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=12181#comment-567821</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/#comment-567755&quot;&gt;Matt Vlahakis&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know a truly intuitive way to think about &lt;i&gt;why&lt;/i&gt; the axis of symmetry has to be x=-b/2a, but of course once you do know that, you can see how the vertex has to be translated left or right since the vertex has to be on the axis of symmetry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One thing that can help with understanding the effect of the b-value in the quadratic equation, though, is to think of the quadratic as two combined functions; I&#039;ll call them g(x) and h(x).  So if, for example, f(x)=x^2-2x+8, I can also think of f(x) as a combination of g(x)=x^2 + h(x)=-2x+8.  In this way, we can see that we&#039;re stacking a parabola g(x)=x^2 on top of a linear function h(x)=-2x+8.  If we graph f(x) and h(x), which both have a y-intercept of c, we can see that changing the b-value changes the slope of the line h(x), which is going to cause the parabola to slide left or right.  If b is positive, the line has a positive slope (uphill as we read left to right) and the parabola will slide to the downhill to the left.  If b is negative, the line has a negative slope (downhill as we read left to right) and the parabola will slide to the downhill to the right.  And while I always prefer to think about the a-value making the parabola &lt;i&gt;taller&lt;/i&gt; rather than &lt;i&gt;skinnier&lt;/i&gt;, it does make the parabola look skinnier and the vertex won&#039;t slide as far to the left or right for a given tilt (slope; b-value).  Here&#039;s a desmos page that I threw together to illustrate the ideas; play with the values of a, b, and c, and you&#039;ll see what I mean:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xjz3updgn6&quot; title=&quot;https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xjz3updgn6&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;https://www.desmos.com/calc...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/#comment-567755">Matt Vlahakis</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know a truly intuitive way to think about <i>why</i> the axis of symmetry has to be x=-b/2a, but of course once you do know that, you can see how the vertex has to be translated left or right since the vertex has to be on the axis of symmetry.</p>
<p>One thing that can help with understanding the effect of the b-value in the quadratic equation, though, is to think of the quadratic as two combined functions; I&#8217;ll call them g(x) and h(x).  So if, for example, f(x)=x^2-2x+8, I can also think of f(x) as a combination of g(x)=x^2 + h(x)=-2x+8.  In this way, we can see that we&#8217;re stacking a parabola g(x)=x^2 on top of a linear function h(x)=-2x+8.  If we graph f(x) and h(x), which both have a y-intercept of c, we can see that changing the b-value changes the slope of the line h(x), which is going to cause the parabola to slide left or right.  If b is positive, the line has a positive slope (uphill as we read left to right) and the parabola will slide to the downhill to the left.  If b is negative, the line has a negative slope (downhill as we read left to right) and the parabola will slide to the downhill to the right.  And while I always prefer to think about the a-value making the parabola <i>taller</i> rather than <i>skinnier</i>, it does make the parabola look skinnier and the vertex won&#8217;t slide as far to the left or right for a given tilt (slope; b-value).  Here&#8217;s a desmos page that I threw together to illustrate the ideas; play with the values of a, b, and c, and you&#8217;ll see what I mean:<br /><a href="https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xjz3updgn6" title="https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xjz3updgn6" rel="nofollow ugc"></a><a href="https://www.desmos.com/calc" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.desmos.com/calc</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: metasong		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/#comment-567820</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[metasong]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 01:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=12181#comment-567820</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;(x+b)^2 = c+b^2&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(x+b)^2 = c+b^2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/#comment-381228</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2020 01:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=12181#comment-381228</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[x2+2bx = c 
(x+b)2 = c+b2
x=+-/(c+b2) -b]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x2+2bx = c<br />
(x+b)2 = c+b2<br />
x=+-/(c+b2) -b</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Vlahakis		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/quadratic-formula/#comment-567755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Vlahakis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=12181#comment-567755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Kalid I&#039;m addicted to your site. I&#039;d love to see an extension or a 2nd video to this one. In school the quadratic formula for me was never nearly expressed enough as solving for the roots of a parabola. The -b/2a portion of the classic quadratic equation is the x component of the vertex while the +- portion represents the 2 roots offset an equidistant amount from that vertex. Hence the determinant &quot;determining&quot; if we have 0, 1 or 2 roots.  I would love to connect in my mind your square/radius geometry with the parabola geometry of vertex and offset roots. So for example if the parabola is simply x^2 + 8 , its the parent function (y = x^2) vertically offsets 8 units. (Intuitive) But when you get parabolas with that darned 2nd term like x^2 - 2x + 8 , I don&#039;t know how to eyeball and transform from the parent function. I&#039;m hoping your square/radius geometry and simpler quadratic formula might help with this.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kalid I&#8217;m addicted to your site. I&#8217;d love to see an extension or a 2nd video to this one. In school the quadratic formula for me was never nearly expressed enough as solving for the roots of a parabola. The -b/2a portion of the classic quadratic equation is the x component of the vertex while the +- portion represents the 2 roots offset an equidistant amount from that vertex. Hence the determinant &#8220;determining&#8221; if we have 0, 1 or 2 roots.  I would love to connect in my mind your square/radius geometry with the parabola geometry of vertex and offset roots. So for example if the parabola is simply x^2 + 8 , its the parent function (y = x^2) vertically offsets 8 units. (Intuitive) But when you get parabolas with that darned 2nd term like x^2 &#8211; 2x + 8 , I don&#8217;t know how to eyeball and transform from the parent function. I&#8217;m hoping your square/radius geometry and simpler quadratic formula might help with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
