<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Learning Math With Psychological Safety	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-568178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=10403#comment-568178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-568177&quot;&gt;Marc Goff&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Hi Marc, thanks so much for the comment, it made my day. When I started the site, I wanted to help other frustrated students -- I still remember the feeling of being in my dorm room and just wanting things to click. I knew a lot of people were on the cusp of understanding, and the right analogy or example could help things click, and an entire door would open. Helping other students was something I had imagined in my mind, but hearing personal stories like this is incredibly gratifying. I deeply appreciate the note, and best of luck with your program. The world (myself included) needs a better understanding of stats!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-568177">Marc Goff</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Marc, thanks so much for the comment, it made my day. When I started the site, I wanted to help other frustrated students &#8212; I still remember the feeling of being in my dorm room and just wanting things to click. I knew a lot of people were on the cusp of understanding, and the right analogy or example could help things click, and an entire door would open. Helping other students was something I had imagined in my mind, but hearing personal stories like this is incredibly gratifying. I deeply appreciate the note, and best of luck with your program. The world (myself included) needs a better understanding of stats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marc Goff		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-568177</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc Goff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 01:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=10403#comment-568177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;You’re the best, Mr. Azad. Sincerely. I don’t know understand why the affective element is either 1) completely ignored, or 2) deemed to be a replacement for rigor and practice. Why not the two!? I never felt like I asked (during my tumultuous HS years) for easier tests or content, but just for a better understanding of the “what” and the “why” and the “how”. It wasn’t offered. Indeed it’s not forthcoming in most classes now that I’m a masters student in statistics. I want to change math education. If it’s not hard conceptually, what’s hard? A: the way it’s introduced, taught, and evaluated. So many potentially game-changing mathematicians have been driven away because they were taught to believe it was about superhuman memorization and live-or-die exams. I’m about to enter a PhD program in statistics, but if I hadn’t had you, 3B1B, Math Is Fun, Strogatz, and a few awesome professors, I would have never had the courage (or confidence or clarity) to continue with math.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Put another way, the Code is all that’s presented in 99% of math clases. What about Clarity? Connection to other ideas? Courage and Confidence. Cognitive elements matter, but the affective elements matter, too. I need to Compute — sure— but I also need to Comprehend, Connect, and have Confidence and Courage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(I’m an atheist but) God bless you for your work here at BE. If nothing else, you’ve made it possible to put one more statistician in this world by making math accessible and comprehensible and beautiful and fun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you, Kalhid.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You’re the best, Mr. Azad. Sincerely. I don’t know understand why the affective element is either 1) completely ignored, or 2) deemed to be a replacement for rigor and practice. Why not the two!? I never felt like I asked (during my tumultuous HS years) for easier tests or content, but just for a better understanding of the “what” and the “why” and the “how”. It wasn’t offered. Indeed it’s not forthcoming in most classes now that I’m a masters student in statistics. I want to change math education. If it’s not hard conceptually, what’s hard? A: the way it’s introduced, taught, and evaluated. So many potentially game-changing mathematicians have been driven away because they were taught to believe it was about superhuman memorization and live-or-die exams. I’m about to enter a PhD program in statistics, but if I hadn’t had you, 3B1B, Math Is Fun, Strogatz, and a few awesome professors, I would have never had the courage (or confidence or clarity) to continue with math.</p>
<p>Put another way, the Code is all that’s presented in 99% of math clases. What about Clarity? Connection to other ideas? Courage and Confidence. Cognitive elements matter, but the affective elements matter, too. I need to Compute — sure— but I also need to Comprehend, Connect, and have Confidence and Courage.</p>
<p>(I’m an atheist but) God bless you for your work here at BE. If nothing else, you’ve made it possible to put one more statistician in this world by making math accessible and comprehensible and beautiful and fun.</p>
<p>Thank you, Kalhid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-567954</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 00:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=10403#comment-567954</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-567953&quot;&gt;John Cantlin&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Thanks John, glad you&#039;re enjoying them!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-567953">John Cantlin</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks John, glad you&#8217;re enjoying them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Cantlin		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-567953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cantlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://betterexplained.com/?p=10403#comment-567953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-335842&quot;&gt;Eng&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;I came from engineering to teaching and yes, it can be frustrating, and very rewarding -- but one thing I learned early was not to overreact to how &quot;wrong&quot; the answers are. Students are capable of answering &quot;caterpillar&quot; to a math question because they feel they have to produce some answer, any answer and it usually doesn&#039;t mean they are mixing up polynomials with butterflies. Also, the &quot;right&quot; answer doesn&#039;t mean understanding, for example, two sign errors may cancel each other out.  :-) PS: &#x2665; Kalid&#039;s lessons!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/math-psychological-safety/#comment-335842">Eng</a>.</p>
<p>I came from engineering to teaching and yes, it can be frustrating, and very rewarding &#8212; but one thing I learned early was not to overreact to how &#8220;wrong&#8221; the answers are. Students are capable of answering &#8220;caterpillar&#8221; to a math question because they feel they have to produce some answer, any answer and it usually doesn&#8217;t mean they are mixing up polynomials with butterflies. Also, the &#8220;right&#8221; answer doesn&#8217;t mean understanding, for example, two sign errors may cancel each other out.  :-) PS: &#x2665; Kalid&#8217;s lessons!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
