<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Learning Tip: Fix the Limiting Factor	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/limiting-factor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/limiting-factor/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: areelperson		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/limiting-factor/#comment-567524</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[areelperson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2019 20:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=6033#comment-567524</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Excellent piece. It’s insights like these that will actually revolutionize education.&lt;br /&gt;A interesting point that I came across while researching different education systems came from a book The Smartest Kids in the World: And how they got that way by Amanda Ripley really stuck with me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;“In most of the highest-performing systems, technology is remarkably absent from classrooms,” Andreas Schleicher, the OECD international education guru, told me. “I have no explanation why that is the case, but it does seem that those systems place their efforts primarily on pedagogical practice rather than digital gadgets.”&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;“technology is remarkably absent...”&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent piece. It’s insights like these that will actually revolutionize education.<br />
A interesting point that I came across while researching different education systems came from a book The Smartest Kids in the World: And how they got that way by Amanda Ripley really stuck with me.</p>
<p>“In most of the highest-performing systems, technology is remarkably absent from classrooms,” Andreas Schleicher, the OECD international education guru, told me. “I have no explanation why that is the case, but it does seem that those systems place their efforts primarily on pedagogical practice rather than digital gadgets.”</p>
<p><b>“technology is remarkably absent...”</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Trihorus		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/limiting-factor/#comment-345411</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trihorus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=6033#comment-345411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey!&lt;br /&gt;I do love physics a lot because I keep having my &#039;Aha!&#039; moments. I crave understanding and it really pushes me ahead but when it came to mathematics, I was always a dud. I&#039;m about to begin my bachelors in physics and had to rev up my mathematics and I just happened to find what I needed—your site! Now I&#039;m having these mathematical Aha! moments with every post of yours and I&#039;m naturally reading all of your posts and feel like pulling my sleeves up to do some math. Thanks a lot! My words can&#039;t really describe or convey the excitement that&#039;s coming off by rediscovering those mathematical &quot;Aha!&#039; moments. Keep up the good work!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey!<br />
I do love physics a lot because I keep having my 'Aha!' moments. I crave understanding and it really pushes me ahead but when it came to mathematics, I was always a dud. I'm about to begin my bachelors in physics and had to rev up my mathematics and I just happened to find what I needed—your site! Now I'm having these mathematical Aha! moments with every post of yours and I'm naturally reading all of your posts and feel like pulling my sleeves up to do some math. Thanks a lot! My words can't really describe or convey the excitement that's coming off by rediscovering those mathematical "Aha!' moments. Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob V		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/limiting-factor/#comment-333967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob V]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=6033#comment-333967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;great piece, yet maybe i&#039;m missing something out the roman numeral problem, didn&#039;t they already have their number system ordered by tens ( X )?   In fact they may have been closer to a gentle geometric language of mnemonics I for 1, II for 2,  III for 3, then like the chinese, the realisation they needed to develop sophistication to represent higher values. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the arabic 3 x 8 bears nothing visually resembling the amplification of those curves about a waistline to what we know as a squiggle next to a scramble as 24.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a parallel universe they&#039;re probably blogging about &quot;those uncouth viking-bloods of yore and their unrelated incomprehensible glyphs..&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the end, we&#039;re both in the marketplace of practicality, snapping up that unbeatable deal of seed, and arriving at our struck total based on our three donkeys carrying eight each as a maximum.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;as said, great post, and enjoyably so!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great piece, yet maybe i'm missing something out the roman numeral problem, didn't they already have their number system ordered by tens ( X )?   In fact they may have been closer to a gentle geometric language of mnemonics I for 1, II for 2,  III for 3, then like the chinese, the realisation they needed to develop sophistication to represent higher values. </p>
<p>In the arabic 3 x 8 bears nothing visually resembling the amplification of those curves about a waistline to what we know as a squiggle next to a scramble as 24.</p>
<p>In a parallel universe they're probably blogging about "those uncouth viking-bloods of yore and their unrelated incomprehensible glyphs.."</p>
<p>In the end, we're both in the marketplace of practicality, snapping up that unbeatable deal of seed, and arriving at our struck total based on our three donkeys carrying eight each as a maximum.</p>
<p>as said, great post, and enjoyably so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kasper		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/limiting-factor/#comment-333223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kasper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2016 07:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=6033#comment-333223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I really like your approach to explaining concepts. I think you did a great job in your calculus course where you described it as starting with a blurry picture and slowly increasing the resolution instead of going through the picture line by line.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like your approach to explaining concepts. I think you did a great job in your calculus course where you described it as starting with a blurry picture and slowly increasing the resolution instead of going through the picture line by line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
