<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intuition For The Law Of Cosines	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/law-of-cosines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/law-of-cosines/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Amine		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/law-of-cosines/#comment-568431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=4759#comment-568431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Two years after my first read, I come back to this article with fresh eyes. What strikes me is how something so simple can also be so profound.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two years after my first read, I come back to this article with fresh eyes. What strikes me is how something so simple can also be so profound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Amine		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/law-of-cosines/#comment-568344</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 18:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=4759#comment-568344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thank you for this article, but the geometric proof is not intuitive at all, a lot of data is missing.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this article, but the geometric proof is not intuitive at all, a lot of data is missing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nia		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/law-of-cosines/#comment-568129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2021 22:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=4759#comment-568129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;That analogy of Alice and Bob helping or hurting each other and combining the individual interactions is genius...&quot;multiplication shows what happens when the parts of a system interact&quot; &lt;br&gt;Really helped in my understanding of the ideas behind calculus formulas. Never get rid of this site!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That analogy of Alice and Bob helping or hurting each other and combining the individual interactions is genius&#8230;&#8221;multiplication shows what happens when the parts of a system interact&#8221; <br />Really helped in my understanding of the ideas behind calculus formulas. Never get rid of this site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/law-of-cosines/#comment-567614</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 19:55:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=4759#comment-567614</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@kalid Did you ever write more about the &quot;idea that area is a generic, easily combinable quantity but individual paths are not&quot;? I&#039;d be interested in reading it if so. Your great post titled &quot;Pythagorean Theorem As Sweeping Area&quot; seems related, but I&#039;d love to read more. And is this idea somehow related to why statistics uses squares in standard deviation and least-squares regression?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kalid Did you ever write more about the &#8220;idea that area is a generic, easily combinable quantity but individual paths are not&#8221;? I&#8217;d be interested in reading it if so. Your great post titled &#8220;Pythagorean Theorem As Sweeping Area&#8221; seems related, but I&#8217;d love to read more. And is this idea somehow related to why statistics uses squares in standard deviation and least-squares regression?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
