<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Intuitive Arithmetic With Complex Numbers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:33:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Akgang		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-568298</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akgang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-568298</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-568296&quot;&gt;Akgang&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Oups yes it is imbecile. Sorry i haven’t seen the article on the imaginary numbers. Thanks&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-568296">Akgang</a>.</p>
<p>Oups yes it is imbecile. Sorry i haven’t seen the article on the imaginary numbers. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Akgang		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-568296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Akgang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-568296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hi and thanks for all this. I’m not good at math and my few basis are old so I’m happy to find here a way to understand some scientific articles in deep (for example what a convolution is) . But here i have problems with the complex numbers: what does the i become when calculating the magnitude? Why don’t you develop the formula that gives -7+24i in the multiplication section? Can’t guess i2=-1 (got it by other means)?&lt;br /&gt;Sorry if it seems imbecile, just think you’d develop&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi and thanks for all this. I’m not good at math and my few basis are old so I’m happy to find here a way to understand some scientific articles in deep (for example what a convolution is) . But here i have problems with the complex numbers: what does the i become when calculating the magnitude? Why don’t you develop the formula that gives -7+24i in the multiplication section? Can’t guess i2=-1 (got it by other means)?<br />
Sorry if it seems imbecile, just think you’d develop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-567968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-567968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-567967&quot;&gt;John Cantlin&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Thanks John, hope the analogy works for them!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-567967">John Cantlin</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks John, hope the analogy works for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John Cantlin		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-567967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Cantlin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2020 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-567967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Great lesson. I really like the comparison of the &quot;implied addition&quot; used in mixed fractions with the explicit addition used in the a + bi form of complex numbers. My beginning algebra students often balk at those mysterious complex numbers and having a real and an imaginary part can add to the mystery and that is a nice tie-in to something they find simple and familiar. I can feel myself &quot;hand waving&quot; past this idea when I introduce it and I think this gives me something I can explain with more assurance. Thanks for the idea!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great lesson. I really like the comparison of the "implied addition" used in mixed fractions with the explicit addition used in the a + bi form of complex numbers. My beginning algebra students often balk at those mysterious complex numbers and having a real and an imaginary part can add to the mystery and that is a nice tie-in to something they find simple and familiar. I can feel myself "hand waving" past this idea when I introduce it and I think this gives me something I can explain with more assurance. Thanks for the idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
