<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BetterExplained Calculus Course Now Available (Public Beta)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:23:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-379845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 23:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-379845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;1zqjxf&#039;&quot;(){}:/1zqjxf;9&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1zqjxf'"(){}:/1zqjxf;9</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: navneet		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-328067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[navneet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-328067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;hi khalid....,,, i have thought of a small intuitive idea on &quot;laplace transform&quot; need your suggestions on  it....&lt;br /&gt;Laplace transform are basically used to solve differential equation. we know that  derivative of e^x  =e^x the same function.... so if we can express a function f(t) in terms of e^x all the D operators will vanish... and we will get a simple  picture ... something like watching a function wearing exponential glasses .. and how do we do that... by division...like how many 2 are there in 10 ??? =10/2=5 .... likewise how much (scaling factor) of e^xt in f(t)..??= f(t)/e^xt.... but since the function f(t) is extending in time ,so we have to integrate  to get real expression of f(t) in e^xt. thus we get L{f(t)} =integration f(t)*e^-xt dt..&lt;br /&gt;i also think the term &quot;s&quot; used to denote variable in laplace transform is misleading... it should be &quot;sigma&quot; (i don&#039;t know how to write its symbol :D :D)...&lt;br /&gt;my textbook uses s&amp;gt;o ,s&amp;lt;k like terms where s is complex variable...and i have  learned that complex variables do not have ordering property (i.e they can&amp;#039;t be compared by equality or inequality ) and that confused me .... i even had a argument with the teacher....&lt;br /&gt;need some intuitive lessons on complex integration and analytic functions....help to rescue&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi khalid....,,, i have thought of a small intuitive idea on "laplace transform" need your suggestions on  it....<br />
Laplace transform are basically used to solve differential equation. we know that  derivative of e^x  =e^x the same function.... so if we can express a function f(t) in terms of e^x all the D operators will vanish... and we will get a simple  picture ... something like watching a function wearing exponential glasses .. and how do we do that... by division...like how many 2 are there in 10 ??? =10/2=5 .... likewise how much (scaling factor) of e^xt in f(t)..??= f(t)/e^xt.... but since the function f(t) is extending in time ,so we have to integrate  to get real expression of f(t) in e^xt. thus we get L{f(t)} =integration f(t)*e^-xt dt..<br />
i also think the term "s" used to denote variable in laplace transform is misleading... it should be "sigma" (i don't know how to write its symbol :D :D)...<br />
my textbook uses s&gt;o ,s&lt;k like terms where s is complex variable...and i have  learned that complex variables do not have ordering property (i.e they can&#039;t be compared by equality or inequality ) and that confused me .... i even had a argument with the teacher....<br />
need some intuitive lessons on complex integration and analytic functions....help to rescue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-327613</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-327613</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Hey Tim, thanks for the comment. Great point. There&#039;s something neat that a curve holds so much information in the derivative -- it&#039;s almost like a hologram (or a cell in a body) where any tiny portion contains information about the greater whole. The equation for each derivative can be used to create the parent curve.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim, thanks for the comment. Great point. There's something neat that a curve holds so much information in the derivative -- it's almost like a hologram (or a cell in a body) where any tiny portion contains information about the greater whole. The equation for each derivative can be used to create the parent curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tim McGrath		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/calculus-beta/#comment-327602</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim McGrath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Feb 2014 18:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=3669#comment-327602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;K--&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In learning the Maclaurin series, I was struck by how the description of a whole curve--or at least the seeds of that description--could be contained in something as nebulous as the nth derivative.  It reminded me of fractal geometry, where the concept of self-similarity can be found on every scale, from the smallest to the largest.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>K--</p>
<p>In learning the Maclaurin series, I was struck by how the description of a whole curve--or at least the seeds of that description--could be contained in something as nebulous as the nth derivative.  It reminded me of fractal geometry, where the concept of self-similarity can be found on every scale, from the smallest to the largest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
