<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Quirky Introduction To Number Systems	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2020 16:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Imran		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Imran]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2020 16:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567258&quot;&gt;UnderstandingMath&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Follow numbers in base 3 system. May be this will help: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gwydir.demon.co.uk/jo/numbers/binary/bases.htm&quot; title=&quot;http://www.gwydir.demon.co.uk/jo/numbers/binary/bases.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;http://www.gwydir.demon.co....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567258">UnderstandingMath</a>.</p>
<p>Follow numbers in base 3 system. May be this will help: <a href="http://www.gwydir.demon.co.uk/jo/numbers/binary/bases.htm" title="http://www.gwydir.demon.co.uk/jo/numbers/binary/bases.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.gwydir.demon.co....</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tianchi Liu		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tianchi Liu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 17:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Very Very interesting. Another analogy is, we want to read 1/3 from a 10 mark (unit length) ruler. We have to approximate this value by reading between two marks. However, it is trivial to read 1/3 from a 3 mark ruler. The read will be in align with the marker. I think the problem now becomes, is it even possible to create such a ruler with perfect marks.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very Very interesting. Another analogy is, we want to read 1/3 from a 10 mark (unit length) ruler. We have to approximate this value by reading between two marks. However, it is trivial to read 1/3 from a 3 mark ruler. The read will be in align with the marker. I think the problem now becomes, is it even possible to create such a ruler with perfect marks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: UnderstandingMath		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567258</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UnderstandingMath]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-567258</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;I didn&#039;t understand the base 3 thing. Can anyone explain?&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn't understand the base 3 thing. Can anyone explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: kalid		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-328719</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kalid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2014 21:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-328719</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-328712&quot;&gt;Smo&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;p&gt;Thanks Smo. I agree that we do have a well-defined definition of .999..., but most people are only accidentally using that definition. That is, kids who wonder what .999... means aren&#039;t thinking &quot;Gee, can someone compute the limit of the following sequence: ...&quot; but instead something like &quot;What is the closest number I can get to 1 without (apparently) touching it?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intuitively, if you accept the idea of infinitesimals, you can say &quot;There&#039;s a possibility of getting infinitely close without touching. Standing on the line doesn&#039;t mean you&#039;re playing in the field.&quot; and if you don&#039;t, you&#039;d say &quot;There&#039;s no way to represent an infinitely small gap, so you are either touching 1.0 or not, and .999... counts as touching. On the line is in the field.&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-quirky-introduction-to-number-systems/#comment-328712">Smo</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Smo. I agree that we do have a well-defined definition of .999..., but most people are only accidentally using that definition. That is, kids who wonder what .999... means aren't thinking "Gee, can someone compute the limit of the following sequence: ..." but instead something like "What is the closest number I can get to 1 without (apparently) touching it?"</p>
<p>Intuitively, if you accept the idea of infinitesimals, you can say "There's a possibility of getting infinitely close without touching. Standing on the line doesn't mean you're playing in the field." and if you don't, you'd say "There's no way to represent an infinitely small gap, so you are either touching 1.0 or not, and .999... counts as touching. On the line is in the field.".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
