<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Calculus Analogy: Integrals as Multiplication	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/</link>
	<description>Math lessons that click</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:22:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Denis Prozor		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denis Prozor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 20:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s amazing!&lt;br /&gt;super&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's amazing!<br />
super</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dsf		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dsf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 23:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Your site and approach to teaching is great! Thank you!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your site and approach to teaching is great! Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Студо		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567403</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Студо]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567403</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This article has been translated into Russian. Translated version contains link to the original and attribution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://studo.ru/news/integral-kak-umnozhenie&quot; title=&quot;https://studo.ru/news/integral-kak-umnozhenie&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;https://studo.ru/news/integ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article has been translated into Russian. Translated version contains link to the original and attribution.<br />
<a href="https://studo.ru/news/integral-kak-umnozhenie" title="https://studo.ru/news/integral-kak-umnozhenie" rel="nofollow ugc">https://studo.ru/news/integ...</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kierkegaard		</title>
		<link>https://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kierkegaard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 03:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/a-calculus-analogy-integrals-as-multiplication/#comment-567369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;This is an interesting view of integration but it seems to work mostly for Riemann integrals. I don&#039;t think it works for Lebesgue integration, especially if you consider something like the function which is 0 on rationals, 1 on irrationals. Unless you take equivalence classes to form L^p spaces, I suppose.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the &quot;dt&quot; notation; it seems problematic but if thought of geometrically, it&#039;s a volume form on the real line R; choose the coordinate function &quot;t&quot; and then apply the exterior differential operator to it and we get a 1-form on the real line. This fits well when generalizing to calculus on manifolds. By the way, dt is an exact form by definition but in fact, any 1-form on R is exact because it&#039;s 1st cohomology vanishes due to non-compactness.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting view of integration but it seems to work mostly for Riemann integrals. I don't think it works for Lebesgue integration, especially if you consider something like the function which is 0 on rationals, 1 on irrationals. Unless you take equivalence classes to form L^p spaces, I suppose.</p>
<p>As for the "dt" notation; it seems problematic but if thought of geometrically, it's a volume form on the real line R; choose the coordinate function "t" and then apply the exterior differential operator to it and we get a 1-form on the real line. This fits well when generalizing to calculus on manifolds. By the way, dt is an exact form by definition but in fact, any 1-form on R is exact because it's 1st cohomology vanishes due to non-compactness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
