<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Understanding Quake&#8217;s Fast Inverse Square Root</title>
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  6 Jul 2008 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Reenigne blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hakmem 2</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/#comment-166987</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/#comment-166987</guid>
					<description>[...] Quake&amp;#8217;s fast inverse square root. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Quake&#8217;s fast inverse square root. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Prehistoric Calculus: Discovering Pi &#124; BetterExplained</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/#comment-159371</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/#comment-159371</guid>
					<description>[...] Let&amp;#8217;s make our guess better. Archimedes discovered that adding sides made a better estimate. There are numerical methods to refine a formula again and again. For example, computers can start with a rough guess for the square root and make it better (faster than finding the closest answer from the outset). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Let&#8217;s make our guess better. Archimedes discovered that adding sides made a better estimate. There are numerical methods to refine a formula again and again. For example, computers can start with a rough guess for the square root and make it better (faster than finding the closest answer from the outset). [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: DC</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/#comment-132514</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 19:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/understanding-quakes-fast-inverse-square-root/#comment-132514</guid>
					<description>Try asking this guy what text book he found it in. http://groups.google.com/group/comp.graphics.algorithms/msg/e314d9a118639bb9</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try asking this guy what text book he found it in. <a href='http://groups.google.com/group/comp.graphics.algorithms/msg/e314d9a118639bb9' rel='nofollow'>http://groups.google.com/group/comp.graphics.algorithms/msg/e314d9a118639bb9</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
