<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sorting Algorithms</title>
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 07:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Loss of hair</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/#comment-208302</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/#comment-208302</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;You are loosing your hair...&lt;/strong&gt;

You are loosing your hair by the minute! Stop the Loss of hair...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You are loosing your hair&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You are loosing your hair by the minute! Stop the Loss of hair&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Samoel Beheshti</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/#comment-87803</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 02:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/#comment-87803</guid>
					<description>yes ,I agree with Insertion sort!!

I think when movements of the Elements in an Array are expensive or when the comparison of the Keys are
cheap ,, we can also use Selection Sort &quot;! 

I think that Radix Sort should(CAN) be a good choice for Linear Sorting . 

pls.correct if I am wrong!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes ,I agree with Insertion sort!!</p>
<p>I think when movements of the Elements in an Array are expensive or when the comparison of the Keys are<br />
cheap ,, we can also use Selection Sort &#8220;! </p>
<p>I think that Radix Sort should(CAN) be a good choice for Linear Sorting . </p>
<p>pls.correct if I am wrong!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Sagar Mehta</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/#comment-61522</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/sorting-algorithms/#comment-61522</guid>
					<description>Insertion sort works really well when the input is sorted or near sorted [linear time ] while quick sort is worst in such as case performing at O(n^2) ...

Anyone more knowledgeable correct me if I'm wrong :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insertion sort works really well when the input is sorted or near sorted [linear time ] while quick sort is worst in such as case performing at O(n^2) &#8230;</p>
<p>Anyone more knowledgeable correct me if I&#8217;m wrong <img src='http://betterexplained.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
