<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prehistoric Calculus: Discovering Pi</title>
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 07:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: enki</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/#comment-216457</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/#comment-216457</guid>
					<description>Great articles Kalid, any similar insights or an intuitive approach you could share on eulers identity ?  This explanation for pi is the one we were actually thought in school, and we were thought about e through continuous growth. (as in the article on e on this site). Both make perfect sense to me but I'm still blown away by eulers identity ( e(i.pi)+1 = 0 ). What is the meaning of this relation between e, i and pi .. is there an &lt;B&gt;intuitive&lt;/B&gt; way to look at this you are aware of ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great articles Kalid, any similar insights or an intuitive approach you could share on eulers identity ?  This explanation for pi is the one we were actually thought in school, and we were thought about e through continuous growth. (as in the article on e on this site). Both make perfect sense to me but I&#8217;m still blown away by eulers identity ( e(i.pi)+1 = 0 ). What is the meaning of this relation between e, i and pi .. is there an <B>intuitive</B> way to look at this you are aware of ?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Intuitive Guide to Angles, Degrees and Radians &#124; BetterExplained</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/#comment-175838</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/#comment-175838</guid>
					<description>[...] Wow! No crazy formulas, no pi floating around &amp;#8212; just multiply to convert rotational speed to linear speed. All because radians speak in terms of the mover. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wow! No crazy formulas, no pi floating around &#8212; just multiply to convert rotational speed to linear speed. All because radians speak in terms of the mover. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Math History on the Internet &#171; Let&#8217;s Play Math!</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/#comment-173434</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/prehistoric-calculus-discovering-pi/#comment-173434</guid>
					<description>[...] Archimedes &amp;#8220;This site is a collection of Archimedean miscellanea under continual development.&amp;#8221; See also: Archimedes&amp;#8217; Approximation of Pi, and The Archimedes Palimpsest. Edited to add: Prehistoric Calculus: Discovering Pi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Archimedes &#8220;This site is a collection of Archimedean miscellanea under continual development.&#8221; See also: Archimedes&#8217; Approximation of Pi, and The Archimedes Palimpsest. Edited to add: Prehistoric Calculus: Discovering Pi. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
