<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Logical fallacy: popularity is not quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:09:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/#comment-260916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/#comment-260916</guid>
		<description>Question, but... How can Microsoft make an OS that attracts, and yet later on you claim that most people just &quot;Go along for the ride&quot;? I understand what you are saying but you did contradict yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question, but&#8230; How can Microsoft make an OS that attracts, and yet later on you claim that most people just &#8220;Go along for the ride&#8221;? I understand what you are saying but you did contradict yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/#comment-136993</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 05:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/#comment-136993</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffrey, thanks for the comment. Yes, it&#039;s very easy to take things at face value and assume it&#039;s &quot;great&quot; because everyone is doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffrey, thanks for the comment. Yes, it&#8217;s very easy to take things at face value and assume it&#8217;s &#8220;great&#8221; because everyone is doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Garrison</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/#comment-136821</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Garrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 08:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/logical-fallacy-popularity-is-not-quality/#comment-136821</guid>
		<description>The &quot;popularity indicates quality issue&quot; seems to be emerging as a topic right now. I saw something in a CNET newsletter referencing this topic recently.

I&#039;m glad you make a case here for critical thinking, reasoning, and benefits of not accepting the status quo (at least some of the time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;popularity indicates quality issue&#8221; seems to be emerging as a topic right now. I saw something in a CNET newsletter referencing this topic recently.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you make a case here for critical thinking, reasoning, and benefits of not accepting the status quo (at least some of the time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
