<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intuitive Arithmetic With Complex Numbers</title>
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Paulodic</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-172301</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-172301</guid>
					<description>Thank you, from Argentina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, from Argentina
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-153033</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 06:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-153033</guid>
					<description>@Zac: Great point -- I think I ran across Knuth's system a while ago, and agree it's interesting but not very practical. I'd love it if we'd rewrite a+bi into something more &quot;combined&quot; to show that they are really two parts of the same number (just like 3 + 1/2 is better expressed by 3.5).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zac: Great point &#8212; I think I ran across Knuth&#8217;s system a while ago, and agree it&#8217;s interesting but not very practical. I&#8217;d love it if we&#8217;d rewrite a+bi into something more &#8220;combined&#8221; to show that they are really two parts of the same number (just like 3 + 1/2 is better expressed by 3.5).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Zac</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-152324</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-152324</guid>
					<description>There is already a way to write complex numbers without addition in a nice form that avoids addition and even &quot;i&quot;, but it goes under the category of &quot;interesting but useless&quot;: the Quaternary Imaginary number system, base 2i. Donald Knuth created it, and it's an interesting theoretical idea, but quite useless.

On another note, I'm all for rewriting &quot;a+bi&quot; as aib. It makes it more obvious that it's one number, and not two separate numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is already a way to write complex numbers without addition in a nice form that avoids addition and even &#8220;i&#8221;, but it goes under the category of &#8220;interesting but useless&#8221;: the Quaternary Imaginary number system, base 2i. Donald Knuth created it, and it&#8217;s an interesting theoretical idea, but quite useless.</p>
<p>On another note, I&#8217;m all for rewriting &#8220;a+bi&#8221; as aib. It makes it more obvious that it&#8217;s one number, and not two separate numbers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
