<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intuitive Arithmetic With Complex Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:09:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-249188</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-249188</guid>
		<description>@Dennis: Thanks, glad you enjoyed it! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dennis: Thanks, glad you enjoyed it! <img src='http://betterexplained.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Tapper</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-249186</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Tapper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-249186</guid>
		<description>Haha! This is just great! I&#039;ve used Cnum&#039;s when coding fractals, but never really understood the concept. I&#039;m a better man now. You explain really, really well. And i love your humour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha! This is just great! I&#8217;ve used Cnum&#8217;s when coding fractals, but never really understood the concept. I&#8217;m a better man now. You explain really, really well. And i love your humour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-240478</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/intuitive-arithmetic-with-complex-numbers/#comment-240478</guid>
		<description>@John: Great question! The &quot;i&quot; in the original number is more of a direction designation, and says you&#039;re going b units in the i direction.

If I said I walked 3 blocks East and 4 blocks North, I might write it as:

3E + 4N

With our normal numbers, we assume everything is a real number (East/West) so can just write

3 + 4N

And if I wanted to find the total distance traveled, using the pythagorean theorem I&#039;d do sqrt(3^2 + 4^2) = 5.

Note that N (or i) is just a way to designate that the quantity is in a different, 90-degree direction. The pythagorean theorem assumes this (in fact, requires it; it only works in right triangles) so we don&#039;t need i in the calculation. I hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John: Great question! The &#8220;i&#8221; in the original number is more of a direction designation, and says you&#8217;re going b units in the i direction.</p>
<p>If I said I walked 3 blocks East and 4 blocks North, I might write it as:</p>
<p>3E + 4N</p>
<p>With our normal numbers, we assume everything is a real number (East/West) so can just write</p>
<p>3 + 4N</p>
<p>And if I wanted to find the total distance traveled, using the pythagorean theorem I&#8217;d do sqrt(3^2 + 4^2) = 5.</p>
<p>Note that N (or i) is just a way to designate that the quantity is in a different, 90-degree direction. The pythagorean theorem assumes this (in fact, requires it; it only works in right triangles) so we don&#8217;t need i in the calculation. I hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
