<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Develop a Sense of Scale</title>
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun,  6 Jul 2008 23:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/#comment-161923</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/#comment-161923</guid>
					<description>Thanks Led -- that's a really nice example too! When numbers get to that scale, we need to find ways to relate it to everyday objects (the earth) and not just have some giant exponent.

Just for fun, we can do a quick calculation assuming a m&amp;m is about 1cm x 1cm x 1cm. I figure you could make a layer about 4000 feet high! (http://tinyurl.com/4fs23g). Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Led &#8212; that&#8217;s a really nice example too! When numbers get to that scale, we need to find ways to relate it to everyday objects (the earth) and not just have some giant exponent.</p>
<p>Just for fun, we can do a quick calculation assuming a m&#038;m is about 1cm x 1cm x 1cm. I figure you could make a layer about 4000 feet high! (http://tinyurl.com/4fs23g). Thanks for the comment.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Led</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/#comment-161338</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 05:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/#comment-161338</guid>
					<description>Loved the article.

It reminded me of a chemistry professor who tried to get us to wrap our heads around the number of atoms in a mole (6.023 X 10^23) by demonstrating that a mole of M&amp;#38;M's would completely cover the earth (although I don't remember the depth, it could have been 3ft or 3 miles).  Either way, it was a pretty effective image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the article.</p>
<p>It reminded me of a chemistry professor who tried to get us to wrap our heads around the number of atoms in a mole (6.023 X 10^23) by demonstrating that a mole of M&amp;M&#8217;s would completely cover the earth (although I don&#8217;t remember the depth, it could have been 3ft or 3 miles).  Either way, it was a pretty effective image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/#comment-143079</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/how-to-develop-a-sense-of-scale/#comment-143079</guid>
					<description>Hi maheshexp, glad you enjoyed it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi maheshexp, glad you enjoyed it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
