<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vector Calculus: Understanding Flux</title>
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat,  4 Jul 2009 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Better Explained &#171; Xavier Seton&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/#comment-239487</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/#comment-239487</guid>
					<description>[...] Vector Calculus: Gradient, Flux, Divergence, Curl &amp;#38; Circulation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Vector Calculus: Gradient, Flux, Divergence, Curl &amp; Circulation [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ali Çevik</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/#comment-227412</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 05:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/#comment-227412</guid>
					<description>Great explanation, thanks a lot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great explanation, thanks a lot!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark F</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/#comment-226215</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 12:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://betterexplained.com/articles/flux/#comment-226215</guid>
					<description>A minor point: In the Flux Factors section the analogy with a sail, &quot;like a sail facing directly into the wind&quot;, is awkward.
My first reaction was &quot;Huh? That would be zero flux&quot;. And here's why...

If you're picturing a bermuda-rigged ship, to say a sail is &quot;directly into the wind&quot;, doesn't really make sense. If the *ship* were directly into the wind the sail is catching no wind (and that's what I first pictured).

(If you were picturing a square-rigger instead, the sails would be backed. That's just weird.)

So for clarity, drop the analogy, or talk about a ship running before the wind - maximum flux in both Bermudas and Square-riggers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A minor point: In the Flux Factors section the analogy with a sail, &#8220;like a sail facing directly into the wind&#8221;, is awkward.<br />
My first reaction was &#8220;Huh? That would be zero flux&#8221;. And here&#8217;s why&#8230;</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re picturing a bermuda-rigged ship, to say a sail is &#8220;directly into the wind&#8221;, doesn&#8217;t really make sense. If the *ship* were directly into the wind the sail is catching no wind (and that&#8217;s what I first pictured).</p>
<p>(If you were picturing a square-rigger instead, the sails would be backed. That&#8217;s just weird.)</p>
<p>So for clarity, drop the analogy, or talk about a ship running before the wind - maximum flux in both Bermudas and Square-riggers.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
