<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brevity Is Beautiful</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterexplained.com/articles/brevity-is-beautiful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/brevity-is-beautiful/</link>
	<description>Learn Right, Not Rote.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/brevity-is-beautiful/#comment-6156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=620#comment-6156</guid>
		<description>I really enjoyed this read. One thing that struck me was the little emphasis on why teachers ask for lengthy reports or why, at some companies, more verbose code is preferred: Experience &amp; Knowledge.

The act of writing in length helps to expand a vocabulary (i.e., you have used the word &quot;whether&quot; 6 times-- try something new).

The act of programming allows you to become a better programmer (for the most part ;]).

For example:

words = %w(&quot;some&quot;,&quot;list&quot;,&quot;of&quot;,&quot;words&quot;)
---- Example 1 (harder to read &quot;like English&quot;)
string = words * &quot; &quot;
---- Example 2 (easier to read because the asterisk is replaced by it&#039;s action)
string - words.join(&quot; &quot;)

They have the same effect. But, the expression reads very differently.

I guess I&#039;m looking for a a reference to how being concise only works when both communicators are (a) well versed in the common language and (b) understanding what is trying to be achieved.

Just my 2 cents. Really liked the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed this read. One thing that struck me was the little emphasis on why teachers ask for lengthy reports or why, at some companies, more verbose code is preferred: Experience &amp; Knowledge.</p>
<p>The act of writing in length helps to expand a vocabulary (i.e., you have used the word &#8220;whether&#8221; 6 times&#8211; try something new).</p>
<p>The act of programming allows you to become a better programmer (for the most part ;]).</p>
<p>For example:</p>
<p>words = %w(&#8220;some&#8221;,&#8221;list&#8221;,&#8221;of&#8221;,&#8221;words&#8221;)<br />
&#8212;- Example 1 (harder to read &#8220;like English&#8221;)<br />
string = words * &#8221; &#8220;<br />
&#8212;- Example 2 (easier to read because the asterisk is replaced by it&#8217;s action)<br />
string &#8211; words.join(&#8221; &#8220;)</p>
<p>They have the same effect. But, the expression reads very differently.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m looking for a a reference to how being concise only works when both communicators are (a) well versed in the common language and (b) understanding what is trying to be achieved.</p>
<p>Just my 2 cents. Really liked the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalid</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/brevity-is-beautiful/#comment-6155</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=620#comment-6155</guid>
		<description>@virgo: Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@virgo: Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plug: Betterexplained &#124; Coffee and Pen</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/brevity-is-beautiful/#comment-6154</link>
		<dc:creator>Plug: Betterexplained &#124; Coffee and Pen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 07:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=620#comment-6154</guid>
		<description>[...] the previous piece on incorporating foreign phrases, I came across this very neat article on Betterexplained, on concise communication. Verbosity in speech and writing is one of my pet peeves, even if I am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the previous piece on incorporating foreign phrases, I came across this very neat article on Betterexplained, on concise communication. Verbosity in speech and writing is one of my pet peeves, even if I am [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virgo</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/brevity-is-beautiful/#comment-6153</link>
		<dc:creator>virgo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/?p=620#comment-6153</guid>
		<description>As usual very nice post kalid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual very nice post kalid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

