<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Intuitive (and Short) Explanation of Bayes&#8217; Theorem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/</link>
	<description>Learning shouldn't hurt. Let's share the insights that made difficult ideas click.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri,  6 Nov 2009 22:26:19 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emily Riley</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/#comment-260751</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/#comment-260751</guid>
		<description>Thanks for writing this!! Even my stats prof was making this too difficult for everyone, but you have simplified it for me. I now have an understanding of the Bayes formula (enough to write my midterm this morning :D ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing this!! Even my stats prof was making this too difficult for everyone, but you have simplified it for me. I now have an understanding of the Bayes formula (enough to write my midterm this morning <img src='http://betterexplained.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Weisberg</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/#comment-254339</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Weisberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/#comment-254339</guid>
		<description>This is one of the best explanations I&#039;ve found.  Perhaps we can see if I really understand it by trying a real world problem I&#039;m wrestling with.

Here&#039;s the data:  
 - The odds of a chest pain (CP) being caused by a heart attack is 40%.  
 - The odds of a CP being caused by other factors (anxiety, depression, etc.) is 60%.  
 - The odds of a heart attack occurring to a female above age 50 is 80%.
 - The odds of a heart attack occurring to a female under age 50 is 20%.

I am presented with a 24 year old female who says she is having chest pain.  What is the probability that her chest pain is caused by a heart attack?  Is it 0.4 x 0.2 = 0.08?

Also, 78% of patients having heart attacks present with diaphoresis (sweating), so 22% of patients having heart attacks don&#039;t sweat.  This female is not sweating, so are the odds of her having a heart attack 0.22 x 0.08 = 0.0176?

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the best explanations I&#8217;ve found.  Perhaps we can see if I really understand it by trying a real world problem I&#8217;m wrestling with.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the data:<br />
 &#8211; The odds of a chest pain (CP) being caused by a heart attack is 40%.<br />
 &#8211; The odds of a CP being caused by other factors (anxiety, depression, etc.) is 60%.<br />
 &#8211; The odds of a heart attack occurring to a female above age 50 is 80%.<br />
 &#8211; The odds of a heart attack occurring to a female under age 50 is 20%.</p>
<p>I am presented with a 24 year old female who says she is having chest pain.  What is the probability that her chest pain is caused by a heart attack?  Is it 0.4 x 0.2 = 0.08?</p>
<p>Also, 78% of patients having heart attacks present with diaphoresis (sweating), so 22% of patients having heart attacks don&#8217;t sweat.  This female is not sweating, so are the odds of her having a heart attack 0.22 x 0.08 = 0.0176?</p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Better Explained &#171; Xavier Seton&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/#comment-239475</link>
		<dc:creator>Better Explained &#171; Xavier Seton&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 07:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://betterexplained.com/articles/an-intuitive-and-short-explanation-of-bayes-theorem/#comment-239475</guid>
		<description>[...] Statistics: Combinations &amp; permutations, Birthday Paradox, Bayes’ Theorem, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Statistics: Combinations &amp; permutations, Birthday Paradox, Bayes’ Theorem, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
